• Home
  • Crown
A Bad Guide

« Toad.

toad1

28 June 2009 //
709 × 717
28

toad

28 Comments Post your own or leave a trackback: Trackback URL

  1. Grumbly Stu says:
    28 June 2009 at 5:03 pm

    I followed his gaze, and found myself wondering too at what seems to be an unusual quantity of varicose veins in an unusual location, and running rather unusually at right angles to normal ones.

    Is that “farm-labourer’s forearm”? Having done nary a lick of manual work for years, my own forearms would not disfigure the Lady of Shalott.

  2. A. J. P. Crown says:
    28 June 2009 at 6:19 pm

    It’s a hereditary vein thing that’s exacerbated by hard work, so it isn’t usually visible.

  3. Grumbly Stu says:
    28 June 2009 at 6:59 pm

    Hah! I thought I remembered having seen that on someone. But how strange that I remember anything at all, much less the connection with hard work. I think of myself as not noticing much of what is around me, in the ordinary course of things.

    I like to think I have quite delicate sensors for moods, facial expressions etc. of other people, but not for things like hair color and other “identifying features”, as they’re called in passports and the statements of witnesses to police.

  4. A. J. P. Crown says:
    28 June 2009 at 7:12 pm

    If I dangle my arms downwards the veins are very prominent. I haven’t found that this is in any way to my advantage, though it can occasionally shock or impress people at parties.

  5. Nijma says:
    28 June 2009 at 8:33 pm

    Not unusual at all:

    AJP is trying to pass as Norwegian.

  6. A. J. P. Crown says:
    28 June 2009 at 9:04 pm

    Sorry, Nij, but that’s nothing. Maybe I’ll have to do a post on my arm veins. A macro lens would help.

  7. Grumbly Stu says:
    28 June 2009 at 9:05 pm

    That’s not at all the same thing. JJ’s picture shows cartilaginous (or variceal) ridges running transversally from a raised axial sinew, like ribs. Very cool!

  8. Grumbly Stu says:
    28 June 2009 at 9:10 pm

    As a kid, my sister had a wonderful party trick which I envied no end. She could make her saliva viscous and let a string of it elongate down from her lips, almost to her solar plexus. Just when you thought the string was going to break off, she would aspirate it back up suddenly.

  9. Nijma says:
    28 June 2009 at 10:06 pm

    You’re really on about that lens. Mine wasn’t in focus either, but I wouldn’t know how to get an external lens on that little telescoping thing on the front of my little digital Cannon.

    Just when you think the thought of Grumbly in a miniskirt and wig is waaaayyy TMI, you find out he has a sister.

  10. A. J. P. Crown says:
    28 June 2009 at 11:07 pm

    “Had”? She won’t do it any more?

  11. A. J. P. Crown says:
    28 June 2009 at 11:08 pm

    I’m glad to know he has a sister. I’m sure they’re both great fun at parties.

  12. Grumbly Stu says:
    29 June 2009 at 1:19 am

    Sloterdijk, in an interview once, made a neat riposte against the vague imputation of “TMI”:

    Il est effrayant de voir avec quelle facilité la sentimentalité, le ressentiment et le bellicisme peuvent envahir la Maison-Blanche. L’invraisemblance de la forme de vie démocratique est beaucoup plus palpable quand on vit aux Etats-Unis, parce que l’hétérogénéité de la société y est telle que, sans un délire partageable, la société se dissoudrait d’un instant à l’autre. Et il faut renouer le prétendu contrat social à chaque instant. C’est parce qu’ils ont appris à publier toute leur personnalité qu’il est si plaisant de parler avec des Américains, alors que nous, à l’image des aristocrates d’autrefois, nous celons nos secrets de famille. L’arrière-pensée est une spécificité européenne. Ici, on fait la conversation, mais on garde toujours le plus intéressant pour soi.

  13. tgg says:
    29 June 2009 at 5:30 am

    I have heard this stunt described before, and I think it’s just as well that Stuart never mastered it.

    I swear I’m not making this up. When I was in college I knew a guy who said that as children he and his sister had both been able to do this. Their name for the desired degree of viscosity was “the good consistency”. Here’s the kicker: they used to dangle their saliva strings into each other’s mouths. I think that the one on the receiving end would lie flat on his/her back on the floor.

    I later met the sister when she came to visit the brother. To the best of my recollection, those of us who had heard this tale did not press them to perform for us; I can’t think why not.

  14. Grumbly Stu says:
    29 June 2009 at 6:54 am

    tgg, do you by any chance know Walter Neumann? He was my advisor in Bonn in the 70’s, when I was still pretending to be doing a Diplomarbeit. He and Anne were in Bonn this year.

  15. Grumbly Stu says:
    29 June 2009 at 7:38 am

    Ah, but of course you do, being on the editorial board of G&T !

  16. Nijma says:
    29 June 2009 at 8:13 am

    There was nothing vague about it.

  17. Grumbly Stu says:
    29 June 2009 at 9:08 am

    It’s a question of how certain words like “imputation” or “accusation” are commonly, and reasonably, used. When you charge someone with having done something, but can’t clearly describe what this something consists in, then it’s not clear wherein your charge consists. The charge is vague. Example: Suppose it’s not clear what “woblifying” is. When I accuse you of woblifying, it’s not clear what I am accusing you of. My accusation is vague: what I am accusing you of is not clear.

    It’s possible to vaguely accuse someone of having performed a clearly defined act – that’s called beating around the bush. It’s possible to clearly accuse someone of having performed a clearly defined act. But if what the act is supposed to consist in is not clear, then an accusation of having performed it is (necessarily, I claim) not a clear accusation. Of course you can take an accusatory stance against someone for having done something that you don’t clearly specify – like saying that someone has “sinful ways”. But that’s just bad-mouthing, and an attempt to cloak your personal value judgements as “objective” ones.

    My implicit claim was that “TMI” is a vague concept, since “too much” is vague. An imputation of having proffered “TMI” is thus a vague imputation. If you want to challenge this, it is open to you to describe clearly what “TMI” is supposed to consist in. One way to begin might be to say: “It was just more than I, Nijma, wanted to know, even though I wrote Just when you think … you find out … as if everyone shared my opinion. I don’t want to know the following specific kinds of information about Grumbly: 1) …, 2) …”. Only the task would remain of clarifying whether the fact that I have a sister exacerbates or mitigates the “TMI”.

    There’s nothing unreasonable about a vague imputation. What is unreasonable is to claim that the vague imputation is clear, without making it clear.

  18. Nijma says:
    29 June 2009 at 9:15 am

    When the subject is playing with snot, vagueness is a virtue.

  19. Grumbly Stu says:
    29 June 2009 at 9:50 am

    Vagueness is a curious phenomenon, with its own set of rules, apparently. I suppose that your writing “playing with snot”, although it seems precise at first glance, has to count as vague after all. The reason for this is, that the subject was not snot, but saliva. Perhaps the issue here is really Too Much Insinuation, and only intermittent attention to details.

  20. Siganusk says:
    29 June 2009 at 10:47 am

    What’s TMI?

  21. Grumbly Stu says:
    29 June 2009 at 10:53 am

    TMI = Too Much Information.

  22. A. J. P. Crown says:
    29 June 2009 at 1:13 pm

    For me, hearing too much personal information can be a bad thing if it’s narrated in a boring way — but Grumbly’s never is.

  23. tgg says:
    29 June 2009 at 1:38 pm

    I don’t exactly know him, see below.

    Yes, I saw from an old post on your blog that you had “dabbled” or some such verb in algebraic topology. I wonder(ed) what the story was.

  24. tgg says:
    29 June 2009 at 1:41 pm

    I hear from Walter, and more rarely write to him, about journal business, but that’s about the extent of our contact. I confess that the main effect of your noting this connection is to remind that various bits of G&T business are somwhere on the long list of things I ought to be doing instead of messing around in the blogosphere.

  25. Nijma says:
    29 June 2009 at 3:21 pm

    In that case, I shall leave you two to your discussion of viscosity. Which reminds me, would you like to hear about mlouheeya? The bedouins make soup out of it. It’s a lovely green color.

  26. tgg says:
    29 June 2009 at 4:13 pm

    In “Dirk Gently’s Holistic Detective Agency” two Cambridge dons torment a man from the BBC over High Table by arguing that it is impossible to assign any useful meaning to the expression “too much Mozart”.

  27. Grumbly Stu says:
    29 June 2009 at 4:16 pm

    Sounds like a vividly onomatopoetic word for a camel secretion. But do you regard that as personal information? Are you not in the habit of distinguishing between camels and people? Has a camel ever told you more about itself than you wanted to know?

  28. A. J. P. Crown says:
    29 June 2009 at 4:21 pm

    But you could say ‘a little Mozart is a dangerous thing’.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

  • Recent Comments

    • Siganus Sutor on Tree.
    • languagehat on Four Trees.
    • LuileBeith on Four Trees.
    • Siganus K. on Tree.
    • Stu Clayton on Handwriting: If You Can Read This…
    • Srijita Ghosh on Handwriting: If You Can Read This…
    • Siganus Sutor on Tree.
    • Jeremy Hawker on Tree.
    • Siganus Sutor on Tree.
    • AJP Crown on Naziware.
    • Jean-pierre Eppe on Naziware.
    • AJP Crown on Naziware.
    • Jean-Pierre on Naziware.
    • Mike on Plains Indians Drawings.
    • Stu Clayton on Tree.
  • Blogroll

    • Bees in Art
    • Bokmål + Nynorsk
    • BookArmor
    • Converting My Shophouse
    • Crow nut video
    • Konstvilks
    • Language Hat
    • Mab at the Moscow Times
    • Mauricianismes
    • New Statesman
    • Nimis & Arx
    • Norwegian News
    • Poemas del rio Wang
    • Polyglot Vegetarian
    • Retronaut
    • Språkrådet
    • Stuart's Links
    • The Virtual Stoa
    • Tom Clark: Beyond The Pale
    • Twisted Rib
    • wood s lot
    • xkcd
    • Yesteryear's Tools
    • Zythophile
  • Photography

    • 1000 Words Photography
    • British Journal of Photography
    • Chloe Dewe Mathews
    • Conscientious
    • Daylight
    • Foam
    • Impressions Gallery
    • Lensculture
    • Martin Parr
    • Michael Hoppen Gallery
    • Open Eye Gallery
    • Photoworks
    • Source Photographic Review
    • Techniques.
    • The Photographers' Gallery
  • Recent Posts

    • Tree.
    • Two Gloomy Square Pictures
    • Absent-Minded Dog.
    • Ara Güler. The Greatest Photographer of Modern Istanbul.
    • Late Summer
    • Knut Hjeltnes
    • I’m On The Train
    • Here Is The View
    • Tulips in September
    • Why The Long Face?
    • Defibrillator.
    • Moira’s First Birthday
    • Chloe Dewe Mathews: Hasidic Holiday
    • A Man Unafraid To Point Out His Achievements
    • Say It With Flowers & Trees
  • Categories

    • About Goats
    • Not About Goats
    • Partly About Goats
  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.com
  • Archives

    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • September 2018
    • August 2018
    • July 2018
    • April 2018
    • March 2018
    • February 2017
    • October 2016
    • March 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
  • All comments are copyright their original posters. Only messages signed "A.J.P. Crown" are property of and attributable to abadguide.wordpress.com. All other messages and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily state or reflect those of abadguide.wordpress.com. Abadguide.wordpress.com does not endorse any potentially defamatory opinions of readers, and readers should post opinions regarding third parties at their own risk. Abadguide.wordpress.com reserves the right to alter or delete any questionable material posted on this site.
Blog at WordPress.com.
Back to the top
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • A Bad Guide
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • A Bad Guide
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar