Designers visit museums to be inspired or sometimes simply to copy work from the past. There can’t be anywhere in Britain where that’s been more true than at the V&A. Most of the Victoria & Albert Museum was built towards the end of the Nineteenth century. At first it housed pieces from the 1851 Great Exhibition, held at the other end of Exhibition Road in Hyde Park. Construction of the V&A never finished and the museum has had many architects. Apart from one provocative attempt, a proposal made by Danny Libeskind ten years ago that was not built, the additions have all used the same red brick. This picture below is of the central courtyard:
In fine weather, it’s a lovely place to have lunch and or tea (free entry).
A few parts of London (16-18C Richmond, for instance) have been built with red brick, but as anyone who’s been to London will have noticed most of the city, particularly the Victorian parts, is of a yellow-ochre brick that turns a burnt brown given enough time and pollution. One exception is the red that starts here, at the V&A, and (as Alma and I found on our walk after lunch) breaks out again at the other end of Exhibition Road with several streets of large expensive mansion flats. Note the two floors of Corinthian columns on these balconies; there are another two above these. You’d never see such willful sacrilege in the USA or France. The orders ought to begin with Doric at the base and get more decorative towards the top, ending with Corinthian or Composite depending on how many floors there are.
The red brick continues along the southern edge of Kensington Gardens as far as the Albert Hall. Below is one of my favourite buildings, Richard Norman Shaw’s Royal Geographical Society. Outside it stands the bronze statue of Dr Livingstone; he’s looking from his niche to see if the 73 bus is coming (it never is). I snapped this view of the chimneys and roofs as Alma and I walked past; the building itself is easier understood here, probably.
There are splashes of the same red further along Kensington Gore at Palace Green and around Holland Park.
Below is Leighton House, built near Holland Park by the Victorian painter Frederic Leighton over a period of thirty years. Lord Leighton was unlucky: he died the day after he was made a baron. For 18 years, he’d been Sir Frederic, Bt and it’s only posterity that knows him as ‘Lord’. He was born in 1830 and died in 1896, tying him quite well to Victoria’s reign (1836 – 1901). He started his career as a pre-Raphaelite, but Leighton is now remembered as not much more than a society functionary, a president of the Royal Academy and that sort of thing. His ponderous academic paintings and sculpture seem dreary compared to those of his French contemporaries, the Impressionists, it’s red-brick Leighton House that is his memorial and masterpiece (it’s open to the public though few tourists go there):
As well as the dazzling red exterior the inside is pretty remarkable. The best-known room is the Arab Hall, below:
Leighton didn’t design it himself, he commissioned the pieces from his arts & crafts contacts, including the William Morris & Co. tilemaker William de Morgan. Perhaps you can see where I’m going with this? Right back to the V&A: look at this tile with its dense de Morgan-like Victorian pattern
Although it’s in the V&A it wasn’t made in Kensington. Check the date:
Here are four items from one glass case in the Islamic Middle East rooms. First, a tile from Iznik, Turkey, c. 1560 – 1590.
Secondly, a silk velvet fragment with gold-wrapped thread, from Bursa, Turkey, 1450 – 1550.
Thirdly, a piece of red & cream silk damask, from Bursa, Turkey, 1550 – 1600.
And last a tile from Damascus ca. 1550 – 1600:
As you can see, they’ve all got the same motifs as the panel of tiles below, also from Turkey or Syria, ca. 1550-1600. According to the V&A the spots and wavy stripes on these pieces are either: a) very stylised representations of leopard and tiger fur; motifs allegedly worn by Rustam, hero of a Persian epic, on a tigerskin coat and a leopardskin hat. But here he is in the New York public library’s contemporary (1550) illustration; you can just see a four- (not three-) dot pattern on his hat, and there are no stripes that I can see on the coat:
Or b) both motifs are the chintamani wish-fulfillment jewel or c) while the wavy lines are tiger stripes, the three-ball motif had apotropaic (warding-off) associations; warding off evil by reflecting it back at the perpetrator.
Here’s another pattern. You can read about it on the museum’s own label:
Made in 1262, using a technique from the Eight Hundreds, and it looks as if it might have been made for Leighton House, six hundred years later. It’s very confusing:
Lastly I want to show this bowl from Spain:
Really I just like the flags, you can see them better here, below, and the little spirals (why are the spirals there?).
Keep going westwards from Leighton House and after about an hour’s walk you’ll come to the late-Arts & Crafts red brickwork of Bedford Park, the world’s first “suburb”. It’s a shame suburbs didn’t continue being built to this standard. They’re lovely houses; some are by Phillip Webb (as at Palace Green) & Norman Shaw (Royal Geographical Society). You can see much better pictures here.
And finally a picture of me, with Albert’s golden throne in the background (the Albert Memorial), taken in Kensington Gardens by Alma during our walk.
No picture of Alma, facing the other way, taken by you?
Wonderful tiles! I must investigate some things…
Ok maybe I’ll put up one of her, although I don’t like to do it without her permission.
You ask about the little spirals in the ship picture. Am I naive to take them as meaning “here be wind”, i.e. turbulences ? The flags are flying, the spirals show why they are flying.
Does one have to say “the flags are flying” even when they droop on a windless day ?
That sounds right to me, Stu.
‘The flags are drooping’ sounds depressing. So, yes.
Wonderful post and you look great.
A term more neutral than “drooping” would be “hoisted”. That indicates they’re up in the air, with no restrictions on what else they may be doing. Is there a fixed expression for describing flags that are “flying” as in the ship image ? “The flags are striding” ? “Snapping smartly” ?
Thanks, Julia! You’re too kind.
Snapping smartly sounds good, but the answer is ‘blowing in the wind’ Displaying a flag is neutral.
Thanks for these, Crown. Over the years I’ve found that visits to museums are often disappointing, but you’ve made a grand guide.
Thank you, dearie. The thing that I like about the V&A and the British Museum is the size and quality of the collections. A lot of museums nowadays are just very fancy, expensive new buildings with small mediocre collections. They’re disappointing. Paris is the other place with very good large collections and hence great museums. I’ve got hopes of Madrid, but I haven’t been there yet.
the answer is ‘blowing in the wind’
Joan Baez used to sing: “The answer, my friend, is blowing in the wind”. I didn’t know the song was about flags !
Some people misheard it as “The ants are my friends …”
I think one can be said to be flying a flag, even if the flag is drooping on its mast. But whether the flag is then flying is a slightly different question.
I love the tiles, especially the one with balls that look like stuffed olives.
Stuffed olives! Exactly. Thank you. So much better an explanation than the mixed-up rightbackatcha stuff.
“The ants are my friends” is so sweet, but wouldn’t work with a British accent because of the different A-pronunciation of ant and answer. Which reminds me that yesterday I noticed that Jerry Garcia sings the word “moun-ten”, instead of “moun-tain” which is what I think of as the usual US singer’s pronunciation for the large hilly thing.
“a British accent because of the different A-pronunciation of ant and answer”: identical in my British accent.
Just checking everyone was awake. I should have said MY British accent.
How I’d love that these comments were “talkie comments”!
What about “my aunts’ ants are on my uncles’ ankles”?
Me too. But nobody likes talking these days, it’s all texting. Do they (the young) all do that in Argentina too?
Yes, they do. And me too. I think I don’t like to talk, either… but I’d like to hear those different “a” you’re talking about. (We don’t really have different vocal sounds in Spanish.)
Stuffed olives are a fondly remembered part of my childhood. Austerity after the war was no joke so kind American cousins sent food at Xmas, chocolate bars etc for the nippers, and savouries for my parents. They’d let us try stuffed olives and the like. Yum.
Julia, a friend of my daughter claims that I sound like Sean Connery. So my seasonal greeting to her is always “Merry Chrishmash, Mish Moneypenny”.
Lovely!
(Your Christmas greetings, Sean Connery and YOU, of course =)
I agree with dearieme, I’d love to go around a museum with you.
Wonderful tiles!
Yes indeed. Makes me want to go back to Turkey, where I saw tiles that made me take them seriously as works of art. Amazing stuff.
Paris is the other place with very good large collections and hence great museums. I’ve got hopes of Madrid, but I haven’t been there yet.
And St. Petersburg! I still kick myself for not going to the Hermitage when I had the chance. (I was young and foolish and didn’t know anything about art.)
You look a little like Richard Feynman.
I forgot about St Petersburg. The Hermitage has been going since Catherine the Great and that’s what you need to start a great collection: a benevolent despot. They’ve got some good stuff in Vienna too, I think, thanks to Maria Theresa.
I do look a bit like late Feynman though (like Eric Clapton) he’s got a face that never looks the same in two consecutive photographs. My daughter’s boyfriend says I look like Michael Palin. My own view is that you know you’re getting old when you start to resemble your old headmaster.
It’s good to hear your voice in my head as Sean Connery’s, dearie. That’s fixed now.
My mother’s aunt was known to her family as Betty; she lived next door to us when I grew up and we were quite close. She was always referred to by my American first wife as my “great ant”, but that was years ago. More recently my daughter had a horse called Betty. It was hard to get used to Betty the ant and Betty the horse.
They’ve got some good stuff in Vienna too, I think, thanks to Maria Theresa.
Yes, when I was in Vienna I was taken to the Kunsthistorisches and it was indeed impressive, but I disliked the city enough that it slopped over onto everything associated with it. (Not a horrible city, but I’d just been to Prague and the contrast was unbearable. I kept thinking “Why am I not still in Prague?”) Glad I saw it, though.
Wow I’m shocked!
I’ve never been to either, but I’d no idea there was such a qualitative difference. I love the idea of Vienna before the First World War and afterwards (I love the Karl-Marx-Hof and Das Rote Wien). Did you go to Budapest? How would that compare with Prague?
Oh, I love the idea of Vienna before the First World War and afterwards too — I wish I could visit it back then! But after that war it pretty much lost its reason for being (it’s a huge imperial capital stuck in a small unimportant country), and it’s got a weird unhealthy vibe to it now. In my mind, anyway; this is a purely personal reaction and should not be taken as any kind of objective analysis. There are lots of people who love Vienna (including my brother, who lived there at the time and was showing me around). But Prague… Prague is just a jewel of a city, and I had my favorite bar and my favorite beer and the historic part is small enough to get around in and, well, I fell in love with it.
Oh, and no, I’ve never been to Budapest, though that’s another place I’d love to visit. I hear it’s very nice, but not as nice as Prague. But of course I’d like to see for myself.
Prague is a gem. But beware of the tick-borne encephalitis in that stretch of the Continent:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:EurAsia_TBE-belt.svg
You know who lives in Vienna now is…god, I’ve forgotten his name…frequent LH commenter from the northeastern states who knows lots of European languages and hates anything British but is otherwise super-smart and nice. Anyway, we should ask him about Vienna. I want to actually see the place because I’m interested in Adolf Loos, architect friend of Karl Krauss & Wittgenstein who hated the Sezession and lived there while he was writing parables against the Gesamtkunstwerk (Ornament And Crime pdf). And also I want to see the scale of the Ringstrasse. And a few other things, like the Kunstkammer, the Hapsburg chamber of curiosities, at the Kunsthistorisches Museum.
Dearie, how do you avoid tick-borne encephalitis? Wellingtons? According to that map it’s just around the corner from me in Sweden.
There’s a vaccine.
Mind you, I wear wellies nearly year-round in Norway. Except in the winter, then I wear fleece-lined wellies.
Is nothing sacred?
http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/News/SLIDESHOW-Countrys-oldest-bicycle-shop-Howes-Cycles-of-Cambridge-to-close-after-173-years-of-serving-customers-including-Charles-Darwin-20131205060011.htm
Not much stress in that job; neither of them looks a day over 120.
Have a care: to us they are the younger generation of Howes.
I have a friend in the UK with very unusual vowels, a Polish Jew who grew up in Germany, was educated in England, had some years in the USA, and ended up in Scotland. From his pronunciation of the name of the TV show “Rumpole of the Bailey” his wife (American) inferred that it was “Rampole of the Bailey”.
He would have said Rampole exactly as he said Rumpole, with the British “aunt” vowel: “Rahm-pole”, with a rolled “r”.
She of course said “Rampole” with the “ant” vowel.
I dreamed last night that I met dearieme face to face. In the dream he looked like a famous physicist, in a sense, but I think it wasn’t a real-world person, just someone I made up in the dream. He had a large, imposing, dignified face, not much like how I usually imagine dearieme.
Dearieshe wants you to know that I do have a large, imposing, dignified face. Bless her.
You do indeed, and I have taken the liberty of linking Ømpty to your Cambridge profile so he can see just how close he was. He may have been aware that you were a rugby player, but that wouldn’t account for the dignified.
Can you “take the liberty” with all of us? :-)
Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar (http://www.movistar.com.ar)
I hasten to add that I think of you as a substantial and dignified person, dearie. You may even be a Grand Old Man. But very few people, even the imposing and dignified ones, have faces as huge or as convoluted as the one in my dream.