Last Wednesday, my daughter and I were in London. Early in the morning we passed this very long procession of geese on their way to a pond on Ham Common. There must have been fifty of them walking single file. We had a lot to do, and we didn’t realise its significance at the time, but I see it now as a harbinger of our visit to the British Museum.
On trips to London when Alma was younger we would usually spend the afternoon at the Regent’s Park Zoo. This time, round about lunchtime, we knew we were very close to the British Museum and so we decided to spend the rest of the day there.
We entered past these huge Chinese bells on a staircase by the back entrance:
It takes you eventually into the old courtyard, which Norman Foster enclosed, in 2000, and turned into a central public space.
It surrounds the base of the famous old reading room where Marx worked after 1857, when it opened. Other writers and researchers – from Kipling to Virginia Woolf, Jinnah to Gandhi, H.G. Wells to Lenin – also worked there and I remember there was some grumbling when the Library was separated from the museum and located in new premises. Anyway, the new Great Courtyard is very successful, enormous and difficult to photograph. Everybody wants to know how they clean the glass (I think it’s self-cleaning):
Our first goal was to the right from the courtyard, the Rosetta Stone.
Only one person was looking at the back, and for good reason. There’s nothing there.
The front was a different matter. It’s one of the most popular items – what the Mona Lisa is to the Louvre, I suppose :
You only have to walk a little way, past this delightful 5-legged Assyrian bearded creature – part-man, part-bird, part-lions perhaps? (there are four of them flanking this archway and several more quite similar ones in the adjoining
galleries) – to come to the Elgin Marbles and more half-man depictions, this time a centaur kicking another bloke in the balls almost certainly in self defence.
There were three or four centaurs in the Parthenon galleries in relief on the metopes. There’s also this freestanding horse’s head from the tapered end of one of the pediments:
Alma pointed out that it’s not symmetrical, a nice change from the more static Assyrian sculpture.
After a little while it struck me that there may be more animals on display at the British Museum than there are at the London Zoo. There are cattle all over the place. This is a tiny Minoan bull tossing a man:
There are lots more Cretan bulls, all quite small. Here are three:
In another part of the museum is a much larger, copper Sumerian bull, one of originally four found in 1923 by Leonard Wooley, near Ur. It’s dated 2600 BC, and the display, with what looks like some house-cleaning polish in the background and lines of ducks and cattle below it, reminded me of the processing geese on Ham Common. It decorated a temple to Ninhursag, whose name means ‘lady of the steppe land’ where cows were put out to pasture.
There were many lions, tigers, Egyptian cats, seals, otters and other creatures that I didn’t photograph. I can’t remember seeing many birds or fish.
In the print room on the almost top floor was an exhibition of Goya’s etchings and those of some of his contemporaries. One of them had etched a copy of His Majesty’s Giant Ant-eater, a 1 x 2-metre painting recently attributed to Goya, in Madrid. Apparently the animal was brought, aged two-and-a-half, from Buenos Aires, and was presented to Carlos III in 1776. As far as I know it led a happy life in Spain.
As well as the crazy, grizzly Disasters of War (Los desastres de la guerra) aquatint etchings which I won’t show here, Goya himself had quite a lot of bullfight scenes and a couple of dogs on show. And then there was this elephant, called Who Will Bell the Cat? (Quién le pondrá el cascabel al gato?), from Los Proverbios.
The generally accepted interpretation of this print is that the elephant, representing the people, is being seduced into accepting laws which would sap its strength and put it at the mercy of the ruling class. The fable of the mice who held a meeting to discuss what to do with the cat (they decided to bell it, but then had to decide who would take on the task) was in an anthology that was almost surely known to Goya. In the composition one of the cowering Moors holds a book (laws?) while another holds out a bell harness in the direction of the massive animal.
There were a few other things I photographed. One, next to the Goyas, was this Indian openwork teacup; I wondered at first why the tea didn’t come spilling out of the holes but it’s got a leakproof layer inside:
Here’s the BM’s own picture, below; it’s quite different from mine. The museum says the teacup is from 1900 and cast from silver at the Workshop of Oomersee Mawjee (also spelled Oomersi Mawji) in Bhuj, Gujarat, in western India. “The greatest silversmith in India”, here are some photographs of a holy-water container he made, from silver and coco-de-mer, in the form of a cow.
Another object I liked was this large Japanese Haniwa 埴輪 terracotta tomb figure, upstairs. He’s from around 500 AD, a warrior chieftain from Ibaraki. This is a subject I know nothing about but I like the hat, beard, tunic and trousers. It’s nothing like any Japanese art or costume that I’ve seen elsewhere.
We got out of the BM, at the front end, at about three thirty.
There was just time for a cup of tea at the London Review of Books‘ bookshop & café, round the corner, and then we had to head home. I didn’t see one single goat all day.
Curious that an art dealer (the one you linked for Goya’s cat picture) would get the title wrong of that famous print. It should be “Quién le pondrá el cascabel al gato ?” Even with a rudimentary knowledge of Spanish, such as I have, and ignoring the missing accents, one must balk at “Quien se pondra ..”, which means “who will put (on himself) …”. .
I found many other art dealer web sites in English and German that show “se” instead of “le”. Spanish web sites get it right.
Thanks. I (or actually google) had already picked up one mistake in that sentence, where they wrote “at” instead of al.
“I didn’t see one single goat all day” : How hard was it?
I wrote “cat picture” because the elephant is raising its back like an angry cat.
“Arching” is the word I was looking for.
the elephant is raising its back like an angry cat
Yes, it is, isn’t it? That must be why it looks less gravity bound than most elephants, as if it’s about to float away.
How hard was it?
Well, it only struck me later. I’m surprised there weren’t more goats at the BM, and I’ll have to make a proper search next time I’m there.
Gosh! The BM seems to have changed a lot. Sadly a lot of my motivation for going there went, with the manuscripts. But I guess there’s still a lot to see. How wonderful it all looks. Really, really surprising you saw no goats; but the geese were terrific! And you got an Argentine animal to boot! Yes, that elephant displays very feline ire. I don’t get into central London nearly enough.
=D
I loved wandering with you through the Museum!
I wonder what could there be here in Buenos Aires in 1776. Probably not much… we’re a very young city.
Of course Grumbly and you were right about the saying “¿Quién LE pondrá el cascabel al gato?”
(And, yes, your photo of the teacup is much better than theirs.)
It’s an interesting illustrated feature of this excellent museum. I visited it unfortunately in a rush some years ago. Especially I liked all Egyptian pieces but, above all, I was moved because of the Rosetta Stone.
As for the Minoan bull, as far as I’m concerned, the man could be jumping over the bull (before Goya’s time! :-) ) according to some pictures I’ve seen with respect to this civilization.
My first impression about this Japanese figure was thinking in a Gaucho person, although Julia is likely to correct me:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaucho
As regards Goya’s etching, the correction of Grumbly is right. Also I’ve just read in an information made by Prado Museum that the French revue “L’Art” entitled this picture “Other lows to people” explaining that elephant symbolizes ordinary people who received different lows to upper class.
I’m sorry. At least, I have to rewrite that:
“…was to think…”
Jesús, I’m sure you’re right that the Cretan is jumping over the bull. I’ll rephrase that bit.
I too thought the Japanese chief looked like a gaucho man; it may be the reason I like it so much. However, I didn’t realise an actual Spanish person would think the same, and I’m very pleased to hear it. But as you say, we need Julia’s agreement.
Julia, I’m so glad you like my teacup better. I was unsure; theirs has more information, but it looks cold.
I’ll see if there’s a picture of BA in the 1770s. I was hoping you could fill us in on the ant eaters: are they still there? Do they also eat jacaranda blossom, or just ants?
Catanea, I’ve never been to the new British Library. Maybe next time. I think it’s quite close by.
I “heard” about “gauchos” for the first time in 1974 when a father’s colleague gave me this comic when he visited me because I had my tonsils out. Finding it has taken me a “lot” of work but it was worth to jog my memory:
http://www.tebeosfera.com/obras/numeros/noveno_arte_pala_1973_1.html
Yes, I agree: this Japanese terracota-man looks a bit like some kind of gauchos (there are many different traditional costumes)
The ant-eaters are still here (well not here, here, but specially at the North-East forest). But they’re an endangered creature. The Fundación Vida Silvestre Argentina (our local WWF) has them as their symbol, as you can see here : http://www.vidasilvestre.org.ar/
I’ve never seen one “oso hormiguero” in its natural enviroment, only at the zoo as you may have seen them too. It’s a pity ¡I need to get more time away at the countryside! (I’m sick of the city)
that’s a funny tebeo, Jesús!
AJP: Exactly. Their teacup it’s detailed but cold, yours is tempting.
As soon as I can I’ll try to get acquaintance with one of this big osos hormigueros and I will offer her/him some jacarandá blossoms. I will report to you their reaction, immediately.
>Julia
I’ve never seen “osos hormigueros” either in their natural environment. As anecdote, do you know the zoo employees give them some drops of formic acid to reduce its “cold turkey” because they can’t eat hardly ever ants?
Good stuff, Crown. The superiority of your tea cup snap is indisputable.
P.S. Have a care as you ramble around London or you might find yourself kidnapped and appointed Director-General of the BBC.
Yes, but it would only be D-G for the day. A week, max. I’m glad everyone prefers my tea cup, I feel better.
A week max might be easily enough to get you a half million pay-off, so do be careful.
Ok, I’ll hire Max Clifford.
I agree, your picture of the cup is far better than the official one. It glows!
Looking up “elephant” on Wikipedia a couple of days ago before making a comment on LH, there was a mention of how strangely Europeans who had never seen one imagined elephants looked like, but the article did not show an example. Goya’s picture would be just the thing!
Thanks, m-l. About the tea cup, I’ve just added some links to that section. I found a video of a similar piece that shows the fine filagree in relation to its background. It’s not often you’d need a video to fully show the decoration on a vase or tea cup.
>Marie-lucie
I don’t understand well your post but I think you tell about some too slim elephants like this one in a Roman mosaic:
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89l%C3%A9phant_d'Afrique_du_Nord
I remember reading (likely in Gombrich) about European concepts of “elephant” before any elephants arrived; I can’t recall what “before” picture was shown; but I know that the “after” picture was Matthew Paris’s. You can google “Matthew Paris elephant” and click “images” to see it many times over; you can also google “bestiary elephant” and click “images” to get far more than the three I have in my computer that I was wondering how to link to… Quite amusing how elephants were drawn from descriptions only.
And I forgot to vote: the filigree teacup is far superior in Mr Crown’s photograph. It makes me want to make a cup of tea!
(And actually I thought the Goya elephant probably showed Goya had seen an elephant, and did an amazing job of putting its back up like a spitting cat!)
I agree with Catanea. I think he was recreating one of two elephants he had drawn with a keeper earlier. You can see a faint line where he’s sketched in the location for the second elephant on the wall to the left. (I read this somewhere – can’t remember where, sorry).
Jesús, that’s a very good drawing, it just looks as if the chest is a bit smaller than usual.
I love those bestiary elephants, especially this one. As well as the ears & claws being all wrong, it’s from what’s missing that you see what’s special about elephants. The real ones are much rounder.
And Jesús’s elephant is an extinct species which very well may have been narrow in the chest – I am worried about the article saying that species supplied the troops at Carthage with war-elephants. Perhaps they weren’t very well fed, and that is why it appears so thin. Keeping war-elephants in fodder must’ve been quite a job. Poor things. Nothing like the poor cocaine-addicted elephants in southeastern asia today, I hope.
Cocaine-addicted elephants ??
I know nothing about that, either.
I thought cocaine came from S. America.
These “imagined” elephants remind me the story of well-known Dürer’s rhinoceros.
About elephants and etymology (but not only) there are some posts (in French) in this interesting blog (To read about war-elephants: “Ne perdons pas le fil”):
http://vousvoyezletopo.blog.lemonde.fr/?s=%C3%A9l%C3%A9phant
“Jesús, that’s a very good drawing.” Yes, the Romans knew the elephants.
Remembering the anteater that went to Spain in 1776, I noticed this among Le Monde‘s cuttings:
The Kerguelen Islands lie to the south of Madagascar. There was plenty going on that year, apparently.
And in 1777 my School was founded in Almadén. The second Mines School in Europe.
Do you know why they wanted a mines school when no one else had one?
Is it a joke?
Haha. No, it’s not the beginning of a joke. I was just wondering why they might have needed one of the first schools of mines. I don’t associate Spain with mining, but I know nothing about it.
The school was to teach people (technicians) who worked in the mine of Almadén, in other mines of Spain and in South America. From this mine they have obtained 1/3 of all mercury produced in the world throughout the history.
You can read that, for example:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almad%C3%A9n
Next time you’re in London, you should head to Crystal Palace Park and meet the friendly Golden Guernsey goats at the farm my college runs there.
Did you see the Jomon pots in Room 3 of the British Museum?
“I don’t associate Spain with mining”: the Phoenicians did.
Laura, lots of interesting stuff about London and animals at your blog. We didn’t see the Japanese pots, but thanks for the tip, they’re pretty wild. I’ll be going back at the BM as soon as I can.
I love your college, Capel Manor College. I didn’t know about it. What a great place, with very well turned out hens, I thought. I like the Guernsey goats, they do look a bit like very small cows.
Phoenician mining is just one of many aspects of mining that I don’t know about. Apparently Spain was the Peru of the ancient world.
very well turned out hens
Where did you find them on the site ? I saw one biddy that is probably not a chicken.
Websters 3rd: “any of various wild fowls in some respect suggesting a domestic hen”.
No, these were hens. Here are the hens. The coppery one’s an Orpington, I think the brown speckled one’s a Welsummer and the black one an Austrolorps, I can’t remember the others. Lots of other beautiful birds too.
Somewhere in here are some good pictures of lambs, sheep (with rectangular pupils) and pigs. All beautifully kept.
Jesús: And in 1777 my School was founded in Almadén. The second Mines School in Europe.
Do you think of Bergakademie Freiberg (1765) as the first? Det Kongelige Norske Bergseminarium at Kongsberg was founded even earlier, in 1757, but didn’t survive the Napoleonic wars and Norwegian independence in 1814, when the resources were relocated to the newly founded University of Oslo.
Anyway, the no.wiki article states that in the 57 years the seminarium was in function, only 37 students were enrolled, half of which made it through the exams. It sounds more like private tutoring than an actual school. So why did they need such a large building?
35 students, I mean, in 57 years.
The British Museum was the only post on my schedule when we had a couple of days in London last summer. As you can all guess, I never made it there.
Maybe they were selling stuff out of the building.
>Trond Engen
I’m only sure our school was the first in Spain. According to Wiki.es, it was the fourth in Europe but other source more reliable to me says it was the third. I imagine that they disagree because the levels of education (engineers or technicians or…) between those schools. It seems Freiberg was the first. Wiki says there Goethe studied but didn’t finish; Also Von Humboldt, and the chemical elements In and Ge were discovered by scientist of this university.
Almadén School was born, indirectly, because of a fire; the mine was burning slowly during 2.5 years; people didn’t know the oxygen was important for that. A German engineer, Mr. Störr was the first headmaster. A teacher of this school, Mr. Elhuyar, discovered the W and an old student, A. M. del Río, the V. There is only other chemical element, the Pt, that has been discovered by a Spanish man.
Now there are only useless as me.
Goethe studied mining at Freiberg? That reminds me of Wittgenstein studying mechanical engineering at Manchester.
>A.J.P. Crown
“Como curiosidad…”:
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universidad_de_Freiberg
And it seems here there is something about that:
http://www.uni-potsdam.de/u/romanistik/humboldt/hin/engelhardt.htm
Something funny is happening while using Google’s browser Chrome: there is now a pink heart in front of A Bad Guide’s address. See here:

Is this due to a virus? (La grippe norvégienne ?)
How peculiar. This is something beyond my control, I think. I tried to enrol in g. chrome but gave up half way through. I can’t remember why, now.
I’m reading The Painter of Signs, Sig. It’s great.
Hey, I’ve just finished it this morning!
I like Narayan. He’s got such a light touch.
Yes he has. I love reading about India too.
In this book, towards the end, R. K. Narayan refers to his own brother, cartoonist R. K. Laxman — which is a funny thing to do within a work of fiction taking place in a fictional town.
You might also like The Bachelor of Arts, from the same author.
But if you haven’t read it already you must certainly read Vikram Seth’s A Suitable Boy. The size of this book might impress the boldest reader (something like 1,400 pages), but when you are about to finish it you start to be sad because its end is near.
I’ve read Vikram Seth. My cousin was his tutor at university, I’ve heard he’s a nice person as well as a good writer. Have you seen any Satyajit Ray movies?
I was once in the British Museum, on a school trip to England when I was about 14 years old. The only thing I remember is that we stopped by a mummified (?) person in a glass case. It did not have any wrappings, there was just a very shrunken and dried up body lying on sand.
That was how I remembered the British Museum from my visits when I was at school. What struck me when I went back this summer was how vast and wide-ranging the collection is. It’s not just mummies and endless Greek vases, as I remembered it; they have Georgian clocks and printing presses, Egyptian cats and Assyrian horses, Venetian masques and Japanese screens, and that’s the tip of the iceberg. Every culture on earth seems well represented, and when you see the size of the collection you see what a tiny proportion a person would be able to learn about in one lifetime. It puts the world into perspective, a marvelous place.